Experts of civil society, owners of private TV channels, representatives of associations of electronic and print media and advertisers, teachers and students of Mass-communication Department
One proprietor of a major media house stated that Government misused its powers on control of advertising and of secret funds to conduct character assassination
They ascribe the reason for such hostility against them by the Government to their independent journalism and editorial policy in both print media and broadcast
Senior representatives of major media houses conveyed to the Commission in person that, notwithstanding a written policy and procedure aiming for merit-based allocation of Government
In most of such cases, the names and organizations were made part of either Part-One or Part-Two of this Report However, as in the case
The Commission noted with respect and appreciation the deep interest taken by all the groups and forums from civil society, directly and indirectly concerned with
In addition to interacting with the stakeholders with commercial business relations with the media sector and Government entities, the Commission also as recorded in Part-One
The Commission would like to stress that, neither in the instances cited in Part-One of the Report dealing with TOR No. F nor in the
Cross-media ownership prevents independent scrutiny by print media of the content, standards and policies of the electronic media owned by the same group. And vice
Thus, to recap: One view about TOR No. C is that, “Yes”, that the government and its instrumentalities have a valid right and role to
A response to this particular. TOR No. C is already partly covered by the Observations and Recommendations for TOR No. A. Further, other aspects of
News about Media CommissionPublished by ANI News New Delhi [India], April 11 (ANI): Defence Expert Dhruv Katoch on Thursday termed the extradition of 26/11 Mumbai attacks accused Tahawwur