1. Interaction with stakeholders, business, media and government entities.
2. Comments are not identified by name in the Notes of Meetings.
3. Observations and recommendations made by representatives.
4. Media houses have been systematically discriminated.
5. Hostility against independent journalism and editorial policy.
6. Misuse of powers to control advertising and secret funds.
One proprietor of a major media house stated that Government misused its powers on control of advertising and of secret funds to conduct character assassination of individuals such as himself and of his media group because of the independent policies of his group and candid criticism of Governmental corruption, miss-governance and nepotism. He said that […]
Read More
They ascribe the reason for such hostility against them by the Government to their independent journalism and editorial policy in both print media and broadcast media. They stated that their media was often deprived of their fair share of Government-controlled advertising due to their refusal to toe the line of the Government-of-the-day including particularly the […]
Read More
Senior representatives of major media houses conveyed to the Commission in person that, notwithstanding a written policy and procedure aiming for merit-based allocation of Government advertising and notwithstanding claims made in speeches and statements made by public office holders of the Government of the day at the Federal and the Provincial level, they have been […]
Read More